FHRS Food hygiene record

Ripe Kitchen

Restaurant/Cafe/Canteen · Enfield

1FHRSID 1714536
FHRS1Inspection date
7 May 2026

01 Rating

Food hygiene inspection result

Snapshot 25 August 2026
Scheme
FHRS
Rating or inspection result
1
Rating date
7 May 2026
New rating pending
No
Hygiene15
Structural15
Confidence in management20

Component scores are FHRS intervention scores: lower is better. They are not the same scale as the overall 0–5 rating and may be absent after a rescore.

!

This rating describes hygiene standards found on the inspection date, not food quality. Ratings can change after later local-authority inspections. Verify the current official record before relying on it.

02 Establishment

Business and location

Business type
Restaurant/Cafe/Canteen
Country
England
Address supplied in FSA data
Trent Park Cafe, Trent Park, Cockfosters Road, BARNET, EN4 0PS
Postcode
EN4 0PS
Local authority
Enfield →
Region
London
Coordinates
51.6585197, -0.1419202

03 Map preview

Location on the map

FSA coordinates

Map position uses the coordinates supplied in the FSA dataset. The embedded map is provided by Google and loads from Google only when this section approaches the viewport.

04 Right to reply

Statement supplied with the official record

<div> The structural renovations, along with the operational and management</div> <div> system improvements, were not reactive; they were part of a pre-planned</div> <div> overhaul that had been scheduled for several months. Furthermore, our General Manager had only joined the business three weeks prior to the inspection.</div> <div>  </div> <div> <div> The conditions on the day, whilst wholly unacceptable, were the result of</div> <div> an unprecedented combination of operational challenges that temporarily</div> <div> halted our pre-planned upgrades and the onboarding of our new General</div> <div> Manager.</div> <div>  </div> <div> A sudden family emergency led to my absence from the business for the</div> <div> two weeks prior to and following the inspection, forcing a pause on the</div> <div> building works. Additionally, the inspection date coincided exactly with our</div> <div> Head Chef's annual leave and our General Manager's scheduled day off.</div> <div> With the physical disruption of the paused building works and an</div> <div> unexpected absense in senior leadership on the day, our standards</div> <div> unfortunately fell below the high level to which we hold ourselves</div> <div> accountable.</div> <div>  </div> <div> Whilst the inspection happened at an unusually challenging time for us, it</div> <div> did expose some specific gaps in our legacy processes. This gave us an</div> <div> opportunity to stress-test our new workflows and refine them prior to full</div> <div> implementation.</div> <div>  </div> <div> Since the inspection, the site's upgrades have now been completed, and</div> <div> operations have returned to our normal high standards.</div> </div>

This text is supplied through the official food hygiene dataset and is not written or verified by BritDB.

05 Provenance

Source for this profile

Contains Food Standards Agency food hygiene rating data licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. BritDB is independent of the Food Standards Agency and local authorities.